M14 Magazine
In stock
- SKU
- T-0003
- Color
- Black
Description
Features
- 20-Round Capacity — Standard full-size M14 magazine holds 20 rounds of 7.62x51mm NATO (.308 Winchester).
- Taiwanese T57 Contract Production — Built to original Republic of China Army T57 rifle specifications, the Taiwanese license-produced variant of the U.S. M14.
- MIL-SPEC Steel Construction — Heavy-gauge stamped steel body and floorplate stand up to hard use in the field or at the range.
- Parkerized Finish — Matte phosphate coating resists corrosion and cuts glare on the magazine body.
- M14 / M1A Compatible — Drops in and locks up cleanly in any firearm that accepts standard M14-pattern magazines, including the Springfield Armory M1A.
- Heat-Treated Feed Lips — Hardened lips maintain proper geometry round after round for reliable feeding into the receiver.
- Music-Wire Spring — Heavy-duty internal spring delivers consistent upward pressure from the first round to the last.
- Steel Follower — Robust follower keeps rounds aligned and locks the bolt back on the last round when used with a compatible follower-actuated bolt stop.
- Battle Rifle Ready — Suitable for range work, training, competition, and serious 7.62 NATO duty use.
More Information
- More From Brand
-
Shop all United Defense
Customer Reviews
Top customer reviews
-
Solid cost to benefit ratio with these magsI have used a variety of brand magazines for my M1A Scout, these are 2nd best. Which means they are probably worth it for the price you pay, let me elaborate why they aren't 1st. Having used Check Mate Industries (CMI) and Springfield Armory (SA), they are tied for 1st place in terms of quality/function/reliability. These T57 (Taiwan/ROC production) are definitely worth the price because they do feed reliably, but they don't always lock the bolt open on the last round. This is partly because the tab on the follower that pushes the bolt-catch isn't quite flared out as much as the CMI/SA followers. From my sample size of 5 (T57) mags, I'd say about 80% of the time they lock open just fine. Not a huge problem, but just something I've encountered. They do feed and feed reliably though, which is of course the primary function of a magazine. One other thing to note, is the bottom plate that holds the spring/follower assembly in did require me to take a flat-blade screwdriver and tap the little disassembly-tab in. While firing one of the mags, the floor plate slid out just a little (1/2" maybe). Because the tab just wasn't seated into the magazine quite enough, really not a big deal. But I went through all 5 mags and just tapped them in just a tad to make sure nothing ever happens again. Which when I compared this to all of my CMI/SA mags, their tabs were pushed in just a little bit more. Hence never having this problem surface with them. Some people note the finish is more blued steel vs parkerized, I think either finish looks good honestly. If you're a 'pureist' and want it to look as close to USGI as possible, then this might bother you... Last of all I would steer clear of Pro-Mag brand M1A magazines, they are not reliable in any way from my experience. Had about 8 of them at one time, none of them were any good. I did the world a favor and removed them from the gene-pool. I don't think it's ethical to sell sub-par items to inexperienced people, like I was many years ago when I first purchased my M1A. I literally just assumed having several jams per-mag is just the 'norm'... Until I learned about CMI (which is basically synonymous with SA since they are the same manufacturer). In summary: CMI/SA is tied for 1st place T57 is a solid 2nd place No jams/FTF or any issues with any of these 3 brands (CMI/SA/T57).
Low cost and reliable feeding, looks good too.
Occasionally fails to lock open on last round. Also, floor plate may need a little 'encouragement' to be certain it stays locked in.
-
Mil-Spec Means Mil-Spec With TheseLet me give some context here for anyone who doesn't know. The Republic of China (Taiwan) adopted the T57 rifle which is essentially a license-produced M14 back in the mid-1960s as their standard battle rifle, and it served in that role for decades. These aren't some commercial aftermarket company stamping out parts in a garage, these are current military production magazines manufactured to the original U.S. technical data package specs for an army that still maintains M14-pattern rifles in inventory. That distinction matters enormously in the M14 world because this platform is notoriously picky about magazine fit. I've been running these in my Polytech M14S, my M1A Loaded, and a friend's Norinco and they run flawlessly across all three rifles. The body dimensions are dead on, the feed lips are properly formed and consistent mag to mag, and the 301 stainless springs give excellent tension. At $17.95 this is genuinely one of the best deals in the M14 market right now. For comparison, decent condition USGI surplus mags from contractors like BRW or HRT are going for $35-50 at gun shows and most of those have tired springs and worn followers. These are brand new with full-strength springs. The only thing keeping old USGI mags relevant at this point is collector value and nostalgia for a working rifle these Taiwanese mags are equal or better. I bought ten and I regret not buying twenty.
military contract production to original USGI spec not a commercial clone!
Blued steel body, follower, and floor plate are all steel no plastic or MIM parts anywhere!Bluing will patina and show wear quicker than parkerized USGI mags, especially with regular handling
-
Great Mags at a great price!Mags are as good as factory ones that sell for a whole lot more.
Price fit, finish 7 reliability
Couldn't get my hands on more of them!
-
Nice magazine!Works exactly as it should in my Springfield M1A. Good spare to have in the range bag.
Fits perfectly
-
Feeds like it shouldBeen running M1As for about twelve years and I've tried most of what's out there. The T57 sits right up there with the best of them. The finish is even and matte, the feed lips are tight and show zero flex after a couple hundred rounds, and it locks up solid in my Standard Issue without any wobble. Dropped in on the first try, fed everything I put through it not a single hiccup. The spring has that stiff M14 feel you expect, loads are firm all the way to round 20. These are legitimately built to the same spec as USGI production and it shows
Parkerized finish is even, matte, and properly done
Feed lips are tight with no flex after sustained use
Locks up solid, zero wobble in the mag well
Fed mixed ammo without a single issueSpring is stiff out of the box, a Maglula LULA loader is basically mandatory if you're loading these by hand